Blog
Sign In | Register 
UPPER MANAGEMENT  Forum Index UPPER MANAGEMENT

Fantasy Sports Neighborhood



Welcome
Welcome to THE UPPER MANAGEMENT. Fantasy Sports Neighborhood.

You are currently viewing the UM as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

The UM opened August 17th, 2007 as a handpicked 100 members who were asked to join for their smarts and community involvement. But the word got out that the UM neighborhood is not just your average start up community! .... Members begun jumping in from word of mouth .. and now the UM stands at 300+ members and over 30,000 posts and growing!

The site has it's very own Texas Holdem table which has members playing against each other 24/7! .. MLB Gameday audio only for the community. A live chat room, fantasy leagues with the winner landing up to 100 dollars in prizes. We also have our own FREE Baseball draft kit for our UM members, as well as an upcomming Football draft kit. We run our own monthly MILB prospect list. But most importantly .. The UM has grown into a community of sports friends. So jump in and, join the UM today!

MLB Rumor Central
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 90, 91, 92, 93  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UPPER MANAGEMENT Forum Index -> Baseball News/Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
youngbuck8100

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 3136
Location: Brookline, MA

 PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

darko wrote:
youngbuck8100 wrote:
so the only conceivable way to keep him from hitting that goal would be to bench him.


They are only 2.5 games in front of Minny for division lead (and a playoff spot) with 3 games against Twins coming up in Minny...


Thats what I am saying. Unless you are throwing the season, there was no way of getting around picking up Thome's option
_________________
 
darko

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 5356
Location: Melbourne, AUS

 PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Quote:
The North County Times reports that the Padres have made Jake Peavy available in trades. Peavy is just 10 months removed from signing a four-year, $52 million contract extension, but a 99-loss season can make a team do funny things. "This was a different year than last year," general manager Kevin Towers said. "You're arguably talking about moving one of the top pitchers in the game. But it's not a 100-percent given. Nothing is imminent." It'll be interesting to see what type of market there is for Peavy given that CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Ben Sheets are all free agents.
 
superpoon

<b></b>


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1300
Location: Bridgeport, CT

 PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Peavy's got a sexy contract... they should get some good offers.
_________________

This sig is to coerce Michael Clayton out of sucking balls in '08

Superpoon GFX Archive
 
Derek Jeter 02

<b></b>


Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 746

 PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

A person familiar with the talks told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the Braves and Padres have discussed a Jake Peavy trade.
Dicussions supposedly involve at least three Braves prospects. The Padres would have to get either Jordan Schafer or Jason Heyward in a Peavy deal. They might also have interest in major leaguers Yunel Escobar, Kelly Johnson and Jair Jurrjens
 
darko

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 5356
Location: Melbourne, AUS

 PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Derek Jeter 02 wrote:
A person familiar with the talks told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the Braves and Padres have discussed a Jake Peavy trade.
Dicussions supposedly involve at least three Braves prospects. The Padres would have to get either Jordan Schafer or Jason Heyward in a Peavy deal. They might also have interest in major leaguers Yunel Escobar, Kelly Johnson and Jair Jurrjens


also

Quote:
The Newark Star Ledger reports that the Yankees and Padres "have had preliminary discussions" about a Jake Peavy trade. Peavy has said that he'd prefer to remain in the NL, but his agent indicated that he'd accept a league change to certain AL teams. Expect to hear just about every mid- and high-payroll team in baseball linked to Peavy once the offseason gets underway.
 
darko

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 5356
Location: Melbourne, AUS

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Quote:
Mark Ellis is set to stay with the A's on a two-year deal with an option for 2011. ESPN reports that the deal will guarantee him $10 million-$11 million, with the option potentially making it worth $18 million. The A's got second basemen back in both the Joe Blanton and Rich Harden trades, plus they just spent their first-round pick on a second baseman when there were better players available. Ellis is worth about $5 million per year, but the A's sure are using up a lot of their resources to address one position. It's not like they don't have plenty of other holes.
 
quiksilver

<b></b>


Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 2184
Location: Californ-i-a

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

darko wrote:
Quote:
Mark Ellis is set to stay with the A's on a two-year deal with an option for 2011. ESPN reports that the deal will guarantee him $10 million-$11 million, with the option potentially making it worth $18 million. The A's got second basemen back in both the Joe Blanton and Rich Harden trades, plus they just spent their first-round pick on a second baseman when there were better players available. Ellis is worth about $5 million per year, but the A's sure are using up a lot of their resources to address one position. It's not like they don't have plenty of other holes.


a) Thank the lord they kept Mark Ellis!
b) If you've seen how battered their infield has been over the years - Eric Chavez and Bobby Crosby, the perennial injury duo - they definitely need some insurance. Especially now with Scutaro gone and they're forced to play guys like Jack Hanahan. I don't expect all their minor leaguers to stick at second.
_________________


And we'll be right back after these messages
Fellas grab your nutsacks, chicks squeeze your breastesses
 
darko

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 5356
Location: Melbourne, AUS

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

quiksilver wrote:
darko wrote:
Quote:
Mark Ellis is set to stay with the A's on a two-year deal with an option for 2011. ESPN reports that the deal will guarantee him $10 million-$11 million, with the option potentially making it worth $18 million. The A's got second basemen back in both the Joe Blanton and Rich Harden trades, plus they just spent their first-round pick on a second baseman when there were better players available. Ellis is worth about $5 million per year, but the A's sure are using up a lot of their resources to address one position. It's not like they don't have plenty of other holes.


a) Thank the lord they kept Mark Ellis!
b) If you've seen how battered their infield has been over the years - Eric Chavez and Bobby Crosby, the perennial injury duo - they definitely need some insurance. Especially now with Scutaro gone and they're forced to play guys like Jack Hanahan. I don't expect all their minor leaguers to stick at second.


1 of the more underrated players in the league. I was expecting Eric Patterson to get a shot at starting gig in Spring Training but I guess they dont trust him. Jemile Weeks is about 2 years away so bringing back Ellis makes sense there.
 
Koby Schellenger
Inter-Affiliate


Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 1471
Location: Madison, WI

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

darko wrote:
quiksilver wrote:
darko wrote:
Quote:
Mark Ellis is set to stay with the A's on a two-year deal with an option for 2011. ESPN reports that the deal will guarantee him $10 million-$11 million, with the option potentially making it worth $18 million. The A's got second basemen back in both the Joe Blanton and Rich Harden trades, plus they just spent their first-round pick on a second baseman when there were better players available. Ellis is worth about $5 million per year, but the A's sure are using up a lot of their resources to address one position. It's not like they don't have plenty of other holes.


a) Thank the lord they kept Mark Ellis!
b) If you've seen how battered their infield has been over the years - Eric Chavez and Bobby Crosby, the perennial injury duo - they definitely need some insurance. Especially now with Scutaro gone and they're forced to play guys like Jack Hanahan. I don't expect all their minor leaguers to stick at second.


1 of the more underrated players in the league. I was expecting Eric Patterson to get a shot at starting gig in Spring Training but I guess they dont trust him. Jemile Weeks is about 2 years away so bringing back Ellis makes sense there.


And their best 2B is Adrian Cardenas who'll be ready for 2010.
 
Koby Schellenger
Inter-Affiliate


Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 1471
Location: Madison, WI

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

I keep hearing that Adrian Beltre is available & inexpensive to acquire & I understand why the Mariners don't want to pay him. But, he doesn't need an outstanding season to be a Type A FA at the end of the year. He's at least an average 3B offensively & a top 10 defensive 3B. Sure it might be more money than he is actually worth, but if it doesn't cost much (rumors that Homer Bailey would be too much to give up) then why wouldn't a team like Minnesota, Milwaukee, Chicago W Sox etc be willing to give up a B-level prospect for him? Surely it can't be the money they are going to spend as an average player commands 12M/yr in free agency easily.
 
youngbuck8100

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 3136
Location: Brookline, MA

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Koby Schellenger wrote:
I keep hearing that Adrian Beltre is available & inexpensive to acquire & I understand why the Mariners don't want to pay him. But, he doesn't need an outstanding season to be a Type A FA at the end of the year. He's at least an average 3B offensively & a top 10 defensive 3B. Sure it might be more money than he is actually worth, but if it doesn't cost much (rumors that Homer Bailey would be too much to give up) then why wouldn't a team like Minnesota, Milwaukee, Chicago W Sox etc be willing to give up a B-level prospect for him? Surely it can't be the money they are going to spend as an average player commands 12M/yr in free agency easily.


MLBTR is all over Beltre to the Twins for a pitching prospect, I would assume that would be either Blackburn or Slowley. Seems like alot to give up for Beltre
_________________
 
darko

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 5356
Location: Melbourne, AUS

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

youngbuck8100 wrote:
Koby Schellenger wrote:
I keep hearing that Adrian Beltre is available & inexpensive to acquire & I understand why the Mariners don't want to pay him. But, he doesn't need an outstanding season to be a Type A FA at the end of the year. He's at least an average 3B offensively & a top 10 defensive 3B. Sure it might be more money than he is actually worth, but if it doesn't cost much (rumors that Homer Bailey would be too much to give up) then why wouldn't a team like Minnesota, Milwaukee, Chicago W Sox etc be willing to give up a B-level prospect for him? Surely it can't be the money they are going to spend as an average player commands 12M/yr in free agency easily.


MLBTR is all over Beltre to the Twins for a pitching prospect, I would assume that would be either Blackburn or Slowley. Seems like alot to give up for Beltre


True, BUT 3B is a position of need for Minny. They went with Mike Lamb (with Brew Crew now) and Buscher last year and neither could get the job done. Beltre will help and Minny is rich with pitching. Might as well make the move.
 
darko

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 5356
Location: Melbourne, AUS

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Koby Schellenger wrote:
darko wrote:
quiksilver wrote:
darko wrote:
Quote:
Mark Ellis is set to stay with the A's on a two-year deal with an option for 2011. ESPN reports that the deal will guarantee him $10 million-$11 million, with the option potentially making it worth $18 million. The A's got second basemen back in both the Joe Blanton and Rich Harden trades, plus they just spent their first-round pick on a second baseman when there were better players available. Ellis is worth about $5 million per year, but the A's sure are using up a lot of their resources to address one position. It's not like they don't have plenty of other holes.


a) Thank the lord they kept Mark Ellis!
b) If you've seen how battered their infield has been over the years - Eric Chavez and Bobby Crosby, the perennial injury duo - they definitely need some insurance. Especially now with Scutaro gone and they're forced to play guys like Jack Hanahan. I don't expect all their minor leaguers to stick at second.


1 of the more underrated players in the league. I was expecting Eric Patterson to get a shot at starting gig in Spring Training but I guess they dont trust him. Jemile Weeks is about 2 years away so bringing back Ellis makes sense there.


And their best 2B is Adrian Cardenas who'll be ready for 2010.


Oh yeah that's right. Forgot about Cardenas - they got him in Blanton trade. Now I remember people questioning A's selection of Weeks on draft day when they already had a 2B of the future.
 
darko

<b></b>


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 5356
Location: Melbourne, AUS

 PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Quote:
According to the New York Post, "the Dodgers have offered Manny Ramirez a two-year deal worth $60 million." However, the newspaper notes that "the offer was designed to appease the team's fan base rather than actually retain Ramirez." Ramirez and agent Scott Boras likely have no interest in a two-year deal when they should be able to get at least four years on the open market.




Quote:
According to SI.com's Jon Heyman, the Rockies have begun talking to teams about Matt Holliday and are very likely to trade him this winter. We don't know about very likely, but it's clearly a possibility. Holliday is one year away from free agency, and the Rockies don't expect to be able to sign him beyond 2009. The Rockies will target a top young starter in return for Holliday. Heyman reports that small-market teams are involved, even though they'd probably have Holliday for only a year.
 
Commish
Assistant Admin
Assistant Admin


Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Posts: 1981
Location: Brooklyn, NY

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Royals acquired first baseman Mike Jacobs from the Marlins in exchange for RHP Leo Nunez.

and the fire sale begins lol thought the Marlins pen was good enough, but they got another solid arm for a guy they didnt want to pay arbitration for anyway

--------------------------

Tigers declined shortstop Edgar Renteria's $12 million option for 2009, making him a free agent.

--------------------------

Angels declined outfielder Garret Anderson's $14 million option for 2009. The Angels have decided to exercise the options of both Vladimir Guerrero and John Lackey for 2009, SI.com reports.
_________________
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UPPER MANAGEMENT Forum Index -> Baseball News/Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 90, 91, 92, 93  Next
Page 91 of 93

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum